Who’s next for the New York Times? For some explanation as to why the newspaper became a scandal sheet that becomes sordid,
When his own lawyer (Lisa Bloom) fires him, he knows he’s in trouble and Harvey Weinstein is in trouble.
Overnight, the tycoons in Hollywood and Washington, fearing being infected with workplace poison, began to leave it en masse and almost everyone piled up.
A few hours ago, he fired from his own company.
The Oscar-winning tycoon (“Shakespeare in Love”) personality is not pleasant from the moment the New York Times discovered his scapegoat of the week and splashed it on its covers with accusations that for more than 3 decades he sexually harassed women.
Can that be true? But like we said, I only know what I read in the newspapers. That this newspaper turns out to be the Times, well, I have ideas and not favorable ones. I measure the reliability of a newspaper on how it treats Israel, so mark this as a failure note. Israel never escapes from the Times. Trump never runs away from the Times.
But now I intend the Times to have the war against Weinstein, for years among Hollywood’s most productive filmmakers.
I am willing for the worst, that Weinstein acted like a fool.
Too many of us enjoyed the exhibit in the same way that other people used to buy tickets to a hanging. Too many of us are like this when it comes to women and you want this addressed. But in Hollywood, that was never fixed. Why then Weinstein, the casting, the couch auditions have been going on for a century? Array … and to this day, Weinstein is neither the first nor the last tycoon to ask a blushing naive for an exchange of favors.
Then why Hollywood? Choose any kid from the crowd and you’ll be sure something will choose.
But the Times chose Hollywood and chose Weinstein because in the past he had selected Roger Ailes and Bill O’Reilly for a detailed review of the tabloids.
Both were ruined to one degree or another, and Ailes, who died of a damaged heart, would possibly have been to blame for the defendants in the press.
But as the head of Fox News, it’s done more by women than any other boss on the Array network…like placing in the mystery of the newsroom “News Anchor Sweetheart”, starring Megyn Kelly (or some kind of Megyn Kelly) that ruins herself.while helping ruin Ailes, the guy who created her.
Just a story on the cover and a guy are explained forever.Is there a scale on which we measure a man’s merits in relation to his sins?
A snapshot rarely provides a total image or a real image of a life as a whole.Men and women, we are all an aggregate of contradictions and Weinstein’s supposed great flaw (did it give you an opportunity to confront your accusers?) It deserves our displeasure, however, what worries me is the danceArray …screaming now that total culture has taken over the smell.
Too many of us exhibited because other people used to buy tickets for a hanging.
I keep thinking of a word from King Solomon in the Ecclesiastes: “God seeks [and favors] those who are persecuted.”Neither the crowd nor the accuser.
Apparently, it was Ashley Judd who threw the first or the biggest stone at Weinstein.
This is the unwanted public appearance of this actress who has been forgotten and is preparing for a comeback through the hysterical anti-Trump.
So now it’s Weinstein and it’s true what she and the others are saying about him, and if that’s true, that’s fine, she has to be punished, but ruined?
Who’s next in The New York Times?For some reason, the newspaper has on a scandal sheet that trades with sordidness,
Watch out for the jubilation. You can also anathema if the Times makes a decision that it is.
New York-based best-selling novelist Jack Engelhard writes for Arutz Sheva.Engelhard wrote the best-selling foreign book-film “Indecent Proposal” and the innovative internal mystery journalism “The Bathsheba Deadline”.His most recent is “Anchor News Sweetheart.”” He has received the Ben Hecht Award for Literary Excellence.Website: www.jackengelhard.com