‘He persists’: #MeToo advocates overturn Weinstein’s sentence

#MeToo founder Tarana Burke has heard it before. Whenever there is an unfavorable legal fall, the motion is declared dead. It’s legal and it’s alive again.

While Burke, who for two decades has heard the word “Me Too” for his paintings featuring victims of sexual abuse, recently issued a statement that New York’s highest court overturned the rape conviction. The Harvey Weinstein Case 2020: Adjusting the Explanation of what came up #MeToo is more vital than any court case. Today it’s there and it’s functional.

Verification is the most obvious, Burke said: “We can’t take a guy like Harvey Weinstein to court those years. “

The movement, he says, is to blame for this massive cultural shift, regardless of the Hollywood mogul’s ultimate legal fate.

I also tried to get a glimpse of a giant square, while there was a legal brief that surprised many sovereigns and advocates. Anita Hill, who testified against Clarence Thomas at his confirmation hearing at the Supreme Court in 1991, stepped into the role of the pursuit of sexual love more than a quarter-century before Weinstein’s revelations shackled the #MeToo movement in 2017.

In addition, following her educational career, Hill now leads the Hollywood Commission, which works to combat harassment in the entertainment industry. The other young people took care to reassure the sober so that progress would be real.

“What’s unfortunate about the New York Court of Claims’ ruling is that there is no legal ruling that can represent the same progress we’ve made on the motion against sexual violence,” Hill told The Associated Press in an e-mail letter.

“The movement persists,” he added, “driven by the fact of our testimonies. And we’ll sell tweaks to our systems and culture. “

She’s probably a complicated woman for women and survivors of sexual assault across the country, Burke said at a brazen news conference in Manhattan after the court’s fall with activists including Ashley Judd, an early Weinstein defender.

While Judd called it an “act of institutional treason,” New York’s largest court, in a 4-3 decision, ordered a new trial, saying the first had been attempted through Weinstein, 72, with misplaced misconduct. adding to allow some defendants to testify about incidents that are not part of the CASE. However, Weinstein will remain in prison to be sentenced in Los Angeles in 2022 for some other violation.

Among those who testified in New York was Dawn Dunning, a supportive witness, who told the court that at a corporate meeting Weinstein lost her husband’s hand and the caress of his genitals.

Dunning told the AP that through her legal representative, prominent #MeToo attorney Debra Katz, she was “informed” of the youths’ fall and connected to a number of emotions, adding the question, “Was it all in vain?”

“I had two years of my life,” Dunning said. I had to live it every day. You need terror to stand up to Weinstein. Yes. “

She reported that when she confronted the film’s producer, she had done so through her neighbor and had the wisdom of what she just couldn’t do with her. Et was proud that her testimony helped other women get some justice.

Katz said she worked with Dunning and other abusers, women who felt “destroyed,” recording documents that she used to adjust more broadly opposed narratives of sexual abuse and violence.

“Witnessing at a wonderful cost . . . We’re converting lives,” Katz said. “And I felt like maybe this was all in vain, it’s a very, very, bad feeling. “

So, Katz is that Weinstein will condense into a new juice.

“His testimony was invalidated in court today due to legal techniques,” Katz said. But “no one doubted the veracity of the witness, nor the price of his testimony. And it’s also a dream in this case, what your testimony replaces from the world. “

The testimony fundamentally replaced that of other people who responded to sexual assault issues in the workplace, she said.

“And their center has grown beyond this case: Los Angeles people have come forward, Los Angeles people have supported other patients who have reported sexual assault and violence, and I actually think there’s no going back on that,” Katz said.

Many advocates see the moment, also daunting, as an opportunity to oppose their efforts to spread the #MeToo’s message.

“Today’s resolution does not imply resolution of what has been accomplished,” said Fatima Goss Graves, director of the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund. It should be noted, he says, “that a well-known case does not outline this movement. We are a force. “

Graves reported that the fund has attracted another 9,000 people with reports of sexual acts since 2018 and has funded 300 applications. The fund is administered through the National Women’s Law Center in Washington, D. C. ; The largest Hollywood-based organization, founded in 2017, transferred all of its revenue to the fund in January 2023.

Burke enthused in an interview saying that while legal advancements are for progress, “the formula of justice has never been friendly to the sober. Yes, that’s why we want movements, because the movements have traditionally been the ones that have used the legal formula to do it. “good. “

Burke said the mother had passed the baton to her lawyers, actress Annabella Sciorra, who testified in July 2020 that Weinstein had raped.

“I can hear how devastating, the violence and the horror are the various feelings that many of them have to feel,” Burke said. “I hope this means that for the survivors who will never see justice done, they are still heroes to us. “

Burke, who used to do it himself as a sober abuser, added that he may never believe he’s raping his own culprit in court.

“Whereas the guy who can do that, get a person, a guy like Harvey Weinstein, to testify about his crimes, it’s unbelievable,” he said.

___

AP reporter Alexandra Olson contributed to this report.

Subscribe to accessSite Map

Sigüeños

MORE FROM THE L. A. TIMES

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *