You know his name. You have his number. Since 1962, James Bond has been the spy whose reputation precedes him: as a mysterious foreign man, as a device and espionage guru, and as an agent who has never encountered a border, whether in a country or in a non-public area, he may simply sneak in. in Array
Ian Fleming’s adaptations began in style: Dr.No remains among the top-rated films of 007, giving birth to this mythical first era of Sean Connery disguised as an elegant thug whose women aspire and that men aspire to be in vain. Concrete example: the 1967 Casino Royale had no less than six James Bonds on its fake walls, none holding a candle on the Con. “Non-comic prank is the least rated and outdoor produced James Bond film by the guardians of the Eon franchise.
Connery’s reign was celebrated, the sun sets over each empire and thus the Lazenby era was inaugurated. A candy management for George, yes, with just the launch of On Her Majesty’s Secret Service 1969, Certified Fresh.
Then it was time to move on with Roger Moore, who presented a friendly and intelligent Bond for the exhausted 1970s. Three of her films are rotten, three are new and one is rated new. Not bad, and he even traveled through space.
In 1981, Connery returned for a No-Eon Bond Never Say Never Again, just as HQ hired Timothy Dalton for the job. Dalton’s Bond: Cool and Menacing, and his films The Living Daylights and License to Kill are praised among fashion enthusiasts for their darker and crueler performance of the spy game. This is all Daniel Craig would choose in the future, but with a bigger budget and fewer songs with a-ha themes.
Pierce Brosnan regained complicated sexual appeal, as the most productive Bond in not-so-good films. GoldenEye is a heady Certified Fresh thrill, while the next 3 are rotten.
After Austin Powers mocked the franchise for a decade, Eon turned to the James Bond resurrection as the sullen, brutal corpse we have today. Casino Royale smiles fit, mocking and occasional Daniel Craig suitable for the fashion cynical viewer. Skyfall is also Fresh certified, but there is not as much critical love for Quantum of Solace and the last Spectre of 2015.
It will have been five years when No Time To Die arrives in 2020, the longest wait for Bond’s return was the six years between Dalton’s license to kill and Brosnan’s GoldenEye. At 14, Craig holds Bond’s longest uninterrupted ownership record, but Connery has extended his Bond appearances for more than 21 years. In anticipation of No Time To Die, we searched files ranked for each and every James Bond movie ranked in the Tomatometer!
Skyfall’s number one spot says a lot about so-called reviews that have an effect on the fate of releases on those days. Grain of salt, grain of salt.
It is not a challenge that you have a minority opinion, however, it is no more justified for you to review to depreciate your reviews of what would be for yours. The vast majority enjoyed Skyfall, and it’s generally not, but don’t act like you’re living on a higher life plan that knows more than everyone else.
There are more people who love McDonalds than Gordon Ramsey. That doesn’t make them right.
Skyfall is more than McDonalds so …
Just fatten them up.
He’s superior to you, that’s for sure.
I didn’t fall off the chair and I still liked it. Of course, there were holes like the escape scene of the lantern, but in general dark and atmospheric as the moors. I enjoyed the Scottish Highlands with a story back.
Like he said, “grain of salt” and we’ll take it to the expert.
Take it easy, tiger. I never said it wasn’t a wonderful movie, but the number one? Come on, it’s absurd. And no one “underestimated” the scoring system, I just pointed out the subjectivity of the scores of the so-called pro critics. Everything is relative. Relax.
No, older Bond enthusiasts don’t like new movies. He’s the youngest audience who seems to like the crap in the Daniel Craig Bond movies.
yes, how dare they approve of Bond’s only access with genuine character development! All they care about is an action-packed show, one-dimensional characters and natural cheese.
Skyfall is the ONLY film in the entire franchise.
Exactly, Craig’s films were the worst and least Bond-like of the band. Critics don’t even have in the Bond movies. Evident through the amazing Number One Skyfall above any other Bond movie.
For me, “Skyfall” overrated, especially by the excessive, bloated, silly and unsatisfactory ending. And at first, the combat scene on the roof of the Turkish train was also quite silly.
I completely agree. What ended with the end for me when M and Finney’s character uses a flashlight to watch and escape the attack of space, as if they didn’t know it would be seen.
Under.
All the “Cat and Mouse” images from Bond’s years of formation are completely silly, though superbly filmed through Roger Deakins.
yes, primary school with that little scene.
You may agree more. And too artistic for my taste. Casino Royale is that.
Oh, yes. “Artistic”. The inevitable insult is why it differs from expectations.
Artistic is not the word I just found; I prefer “melancholy” as the most productive way to describe Skyfall. I spent two years in the UK, so the total décor seemed VERY familiar, on a very deep level. The feeling of cold, damp and canopy was in fact not lost at all. My only complaint was that the edition of Adele’s song (in the opening titles) was another, compared to the one on the film’s soundtrack, and I’m sure I hate it when they do. As a wardrobe singer who likes to be informed of new songs with an intelligent composition and a transparent voice, it annoys me when they release two other editions of a theme song and insert the PIRE, in the opening titles. They did it in Goldeneye and Spy Who Loved Me, as well as some others I can’t think about right now… and at FRWL, they had the brawl to play ONLY Monro’s vocal editing during the film (as a source of music on the radio) and then in the final titles of the film. RUDE AND DETRALIFIC! !
For me, “Casino Royale” is Craig’s time bonus payment.
Terrible skyfall! The end of “Home Alone,” the second-category “Mission Impossible” premise and so many stupid holes in the plot, like a bomb placed years ago to drop an exercise on Bond’s head, in the right position at the right time. He feels love/hate for Bond’s story, recklessly bringing a car from a past movie, but at the same time intentionally gives Bond low-tech toys and thinks he is a dinosaur. Critics were so blinded through Sam Mfinishes as a director that they couldn’t be fair about the disaster he created.
Not to mention that the “Bond Girls” were also particularly below average.
That’s because M the “Bond girl” from Skyfall. She’s Silva’s target. It’s at the center of the story. I enjoyed the movie for that.
Those are insignificant court cases in the biggest trend of meaningless things that have happened in older, dearer Bond films.
I mean, Goldfinger in the most sensible ??? It was avant-garde at the time, but a little banal and clichéd right now. Roger Moore’s were the worst.
We love what we love. There will be other people who like jokes, jokes and gadgets. The first liaison films were produced at a time when musicals such as Oklahoma, Elvis Presley’s films, were not only hits, but also shaped the culture of the industry; the scripts had the obvious things that other people liked as they went to the limit. They are what they are and the generation of films is locked up in the “smart and bad” cinematic technique of their time. If we like movies and 60s television, we’ll take a look at what’s youthful to today’s tastes. It’s individual, I like the Three Stooges, The Daffy Duck … He’s not smart or hurting.
Books and videos are low fantasy spy movements that are based on laughter and adventure, not higher or lower science fiction. Daniel Craig’s films are a spy-action drama that is based on sullen cynicism with the shootings.
Fred. You sound like a Bond connoisseur. When you spend so much time on something and experience it, you get that distinction. I’m right about the money.
I have to agree: Thunderball is still my favorite (I saw it yesterday) and On Her Majestys Secret Service is my favorite moment. I’ve never liked too many Moorish movies. I liked Timothy Dalton’s movies, though Maximum didn’t like it. It even appleads Skyfall quite well; I have less.
All of Roger Moore’s videos were better than all of Daniel Craig’s, not even Bond in the eyes of many older fans. Franchise waste. Lazenby a greater bond.
So, because the old videos had stupid things, did we forgive the new ones for being stupid?
Q Connecting Silva’s Trojan computer to the MI6 mainframe is a good idea, what about having a false position to self-destruct controlled via said also intelligent mainframe? Go to Bond’s farm where he hasn’t been for decades, which might not be a smart concept, as they didn’t bring guns and, in fact, Silva couldn’t have killed all the British armed forces.”
I never said it the smartest movie
It also has less Bond. Craig is boring and generic in new movies.
The elders were otherwise who gained advantages from the camp.
The new videos suck. Bored and devoid of personality. No link in new videos… a troubled British generic action hero. Snoring……..
It’s not my favorite, but it’s still good. You miss Roger Moore and the cars that go into the submarines. He’s Bond as a real, imperfect, non-public person.
On a secondary (but personal) grade … I make a living painting on farm animal farms, and in my career relationships along with other fashion-era ranchers and aspiring cowboys, the theme of movies comes infrequently and (as one might imagine) Clint Eastwood’s “Unforgiven” is a subject that most of the guys I paint with do NOT communicate with. Basically, I have to say that 99% of the hands I paint for HATE this movie, and you may never understand why, until you got to the brain once (while helping build a dump for a ‘neighboring farmer’ hobby) that other people on those days identify ONLY with, or prefer to “frame” those who succeed and earn everything they do, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. Unfortunately, life doesn’t look that way. Finally, even the luckiest individual knows a serious and life-changing “reverse” … which, I’d like to think, was Clint Eastwood’s main message to the viewer in “Unforgiven.” Mendes and Broccolli took the clever resolution of showing Bond’s ‘hurt’ look, as they relied on the ”castrated/effeminate’ type of fashion times to identify with this specific theme, and thus increase price ticket sales, which would help Boost Craig’s fourth outing, as Bond. The weather is hard those days, you can’t just take a herera and make a movie and expect to make millions, unless you take your time and analyze each and every little detail about what made the good fortune or failure of past movies. I’ll see “Spectre” in a few hours. I hope you value it.
Interesting and surprising. How do you think it was in the days of “Unforgiven”? Without toilet paper, no running water, how would you feel when you walked into a café and asked for breakfast? It was a perfect film, and some movies are brave, they have damaged characters who want to see and settle for the flaws of the human condition. What did you think of Broke Back Mountain? Two cowboys kissing – eeee-yooo. It was a dead movie and gay themes didn’t matter to me at all.
Craig is the most productive Bond to date. We know how the character was given to where it is, the old SAS, and it’s more than simple, it’s hard.
This is the world we live in now, where the younger generation (especially Generation Y) has not experienced the ups and downs of life, so when they see someone they have placed on a pedestal as their “hero” Array.. and they nullify it (as Eastwood’s character was definitely in this specific film), they simply ignored it and said, “I hate it, so the film is completely thoughtless,” no matter how many awards and distinctions it wins, between film moguls and producers. As for “Brokeback” … it’s a T.A.B.O.O. about the breeders/ranchers/cowboys I partnered with in my profession. The question of whether or not there is “this lifestyle choice” in livestock/modern agriculture is not a problem. We just don’t communicate about it. As for me (a film fan), I am still disgusted by Ang Lee’s selfish shortsightedness/small resolution to put forward his extremely well-orchestrated description of the ”forbidden love” directly from ‘Crouching-Tiger’, and insert it INSENSING into Annie Proulyx’s (problematic) story about two young shepherds running in Wyoming in the early 1960s (actually Canadian), with a thunderous applause from Hollywood’s elite. Ledger never fully recovered from the debacle, even after fully immersing himself in his “epic” performance of Nolan’s “Joker” in “The Knight of the Night”. A young actor of incredible skill has paid the highest price, for the non-public criticisms of Ang Lee, in my opinion, that they deserve never to be humble.
This may well be the result of Ang’s compelling desire to speak through his films to the younger generation in China and elsewhere. I think Ang might have sought to be a “teacher,” but his life took him elsewhere, so he’s now using the directors’ chair to get his message to a wider audience. Even Life of Pi contained great messages, not so sure of Gozilla or the Hulk.
There is a CrowdSens ranking where you can rank all bonus movies. If you participate, we can see the consensus of the group.
and you know that one day there will be an ‘original movie/Bond’. He had an idea of how “Batman vs Superman” connected Batman’s 4 past original stories with a key element: his mother’s bead necklace separating …
Annnnnd wasn’t worth it. The initial tracks and main theme seemed to “set the tone” of the film (appropriately), but I don’t like male singers with their “effeminate” sound; then there’s THIS. As for the amount of “missed opportunities” Array … I don’t know where to start, unless it’s for a very tidy moment when Bond takes a dusty VHS tape called “Vesper Lynn – Interrogation” where he looks at her for a while… a very attractive photo of his “unreadable” expression and then throws it carelessly on the table. YOU KNOW you still have emotions for Vesper, whether smart or bad. I know the time constraints and it all stopped Mendes and the writers from letting Bond put this tape on a player… and/or did their best not to “insult” the intelligence of the fans … still. One wonders. Bautista was amazing, but an “end” in vain for him. As for Blofeld … was much more “intense” than Silva … and the cat was a sensitive attention … but I’m not talking at all about the remote drilling/torture sequence; any five-year-old could have discovered it. And a waste of time and talent as an actress for Monica Bellucci. Honestly, I think she’d be the “Bond Girl” or the “Femme-Fatale,” but surprisingly, she wasn’t. I love watching it from “The Brotherhood of the Wolf” (French martial arts film with Vincent Casell and Marc Dacascos) and of course from “Matrix”. Too much. In the hope that the sale of tickets with unsuspected prices will force Barbara Brocolli to take the franchise in another direction; Maybe Michael Fassbender is a logical alternative?
Oh, please. The new Bond movies probably wouldn’t be as cartoonish as the old ones, but they’re just as stupid. Their plots don’t make sense. At least the nutcases are fun to watch.
I agree, if “dumb” calls one. I hated Gerry Lewis.
Well, you see … Bond doesn’t pretend to be a genuine person. Certainly not James Bond. It’s time to go ahead and locate someone with personality. Roger Moore much better than James Bond. It’s not just about cars and underwater gadgets. He’s witty too.
Well, the original Bond is a witty character in videos and books. I think with Craig’s characterization, the concept is to know what education and experience, what personality, gives this character a license to kill and the ability to do so. Delving into a character’s complexity makes it move from a cardboard cutout that makes fairly small jokes to a character with a more complete shape with hard edges. Well, anyway, opinions, which makes everything fun; bigger than talking about politics.
that said, talking about politics ends up wasting and getting angry.
Well, I feel like I’m living in an exchange universe when other people hire this movie.
If you’re just looking for realism in a Bond movie, hell, in any action movie, then you shouldn’t see them.
It is not so much realism, as we know, but a sure “plausibility” or anything that allows the unbelief of the viewer to be suspended. When things get ugly like they used to, it just doesn’t paint, in my opinion. This is what I call hoke creep, which occurs when videos rely more on reasonable accessories.
Very agreed, apart from Deakins’ charming cinematography, I think Skyfall was very normal. Casino Royale is the only bonus movie that cares about me.
This average in the domain where Bond’s past films were below average in all respects.
I agree to a certain extent. It’s a decent movie, but not the most productive everyone helps keep waving. The story is not ambitious (not to mention that the gaps in the plot are excessive), the scope of the film is smaller than that of the other films and has no merit or suspense than Casino Royale or Quantum of Solace. Spectre is a little better, but not so good yet. In my opinion, Mendes deserves to avoid making Bond movies, as it’s not very good. Get Martin Campbell, I mean!
We want a new director and a new star. Mendes isn’t smart for Bond and Craig’s not Bond. Upgrading Bond by stripping it off of any personality and making it “dark” makes it generic and typical in those days.
Everything is fine. It’s boring and incoherent. The villain didn’t make sense. It’s terrible in each and every level … one of the worst videos I’ve ever seen to be honest.
Links in order of genius (in my humble opinion):
Who’s daylight? Are you George Lazenby?
Daniel Craig is the worst of the group, even Lazenby’s best.
Thank you, other people like to act as if the fall of the sky is the end of all the bonding films. I mean, it’s a smart bonding movie, but I wouldn’t put it anywhere near the top.
I wouldn’t either, it’s the most productive of Craig’s movies and that doesn’t mean much.
This rating is pretty stupid. Goldfinger scored 8.5/10. Yes, it’s the most productive James Bond movie. End of story.
Even among Connery’s films, I prefer FRWL. Goldfinger is great, yes …
I’m one of all Connery’s films, but Goldfinger is a love of years of training. So here it is…
Absolutely agree: FRWL will be number one for me.
Of ALL the bad guys in Bond, the one that stood out the most, which would have been the equivalent of Bond (from the Connory era), was Robert Shaw. The Array exercise series … no matter how many times you look at it, you’ll wonder, ‘however, what if Bond did (or didn’t do) this or that’ or if Shaw was LESS of an egocentric sting, and just to ‘press twice’ on him. And YOU MUST know that the reference to the “old man” was meant to unbalance Bond … it was tastefully made …
Between Thunderball, FRWL and Goldfinger, it’s a pick’em. You can make a case for any of the 3.
I feel like nostalgia is more common than what he talks about. I saw Goldfinger for the first time just a few days before the launch of Skyfall, and to be frank, while Goldfinger is a charming relic of his time, for me it has nothing to do with Skyfall, or Casino Royale for that. Import. That’s just my opinion, I respect yours too.
I respect your opinion; But let me tell you; I saw Goldfinger, Skyfall and all those damn videos last year (with the exception of From Russia with Love). Oh yes, it’s not exactly nostalgia, it doesn’t matter.
Skyfall and Goldfinger much better.
All of Daniel Craig Bond’s films are at the bottom of this list. It’s a generic British action. No Bond.
No one will ever convince me that OHMSS is one of the 3 worst Bond movies.
I didn’t like OHMSS when I was a kid, but I saw it a few years ago and I fully understood it. That’s the five most sensible for me.
It is very vital that the viewer “forgets the moment” and immerses himself in the era of time in which each of Bond’s outings did. If you can’t do that, then the “magic” gets lost in you.
Moonraker is terrible too.
Blasphemy. I’m singker my childhood.
Don’t get me wrong, I love it. But it’s awful. And I’m fine.
Octopussy is the worst.
Well, then I’m not going to tell you wrong.
Wow, this list shows that Rotten Tomatoes takes cash for better ratings. Skyfall beats Dr. No from Russia with Love and Goldfinger? These reviews may be from teenagers and they don’t know anything about Bond movies, but I doubt it.
Oh, and Her Majesty’s Secret Service is the lower level.
OHMSS strangely satisfying and made me wonder why Lazenby didn’t notice on paper again.
the short edition is that he intended to continue with the bonus franchise, but he left because he may not agree with the producers.
Despite the serious animosity between Connory and Cubby/ Saltzman, they knew that Connory, despite each and every one, would reprise his role, if it were not for another reason … because the enthusiasts were looking for it. Lazenby was a mandatory transitional product to promote franchise; and unfortunately he let his new celebrity “get in his head.” Despite the on-screen chemistry between them, Riggs could not bear it at all; however, his incredibly realistic performances are a testament to his non-public field as an actor. He deserved EVERY penny he earned for his paintings in this film. The tale between my five most productive bond-Girls /Femme-Fatales, including: Jill St. James, Maud Adams (in ‘Octopussy’), Barbara Bach (Spy I enjoyed myself) and Barbara Carrera (Never Say Never). . The only thing I can’t bear about Lazenby’s story is the way he “moans” about it, each and every time he’s asked… decades after the fact. If only you were looking to show a little more discretion and the AristocracyArray..
You’re right, Lazenby is probably the weakest component of this film. However, another five more sensible contenders.
Respectfully disagree on all points. For me, the five most sensible for Bond are: 1. Skyfall 2. The Living Daylights 3. From Russia with love 4. Casino Royale 5. To Her Majesty’s Secret Service.
More strength for you, sir, as long as you realize there is an excessive minority.
I’m sorry, but Skyfall is a garbage can. Oh, did they leave a trail that only a hacker can follow so bond can go home alone from his training years? So the bad guys end up an entire army to attack them, and Bond is still alone and two other people to fight them? The total ending is absurd, I came out of the theater visibly angry.
Just breathe DEEP and repeat after us: “It’s JUST a mo life.” Having said that, I say “feelings of pain”; I felt the same way about JJ Abrams about the redesign of “Wrath of Khan,” where instead of Spock, it’s time to die for KIRKS, while the company is saved. Abrams even had the absolute VAG for Chris Pine to mimic the interference: “Ship…”. out of DANGER? “Speech before his death scene, but at least he did not whisper Quintus imitated Shatner’s notorious whisper: “Nooo” Nimoy’s death scene … or maybe Quintus didn’t want to do it, out of natural respect for the legacy of Nimoy and Shatners? Anyway, you sense my point, don’t you? The absurdity thrown in the face of die-hard REAL enthusiasts (no puning) is harmful, if we have to remain the fan base.
Hmmm Roger Ebert wrote that Skyfall “the most productive Bond film in a long time” and Grown manboy wrote “Skyfall a trash can.”
Roger Ebert … or older boy …
This is a delicate question …
Skyfall is seriously overrated, it’s a smart movie, but it’s not far from the best.
I know, I miss all those stupid little tricks and clichés that not even a ton of “voluntary suspension of disbelief” could help. Do you think a car that turns into a submarine and then flies away would have helped?
Or maybe they just don’t wear nostalgic lenses and admit that, objectively, old Bond movies are silly and a little dated.
It’s funny how in the end the HAD TRACo evaluators beat Casino Royale and Skyfall in front of Dr. No, Goldfinger and From Russia With Love, even though they had lower RT scores. It’s a ‘weighted formula’. Speak braggedly – LOL!
Casino Royale is so overrated!
I know this list is controlled through scores, but that’s absolutely wrong. But it doesn’t hurt, because it’s by consensus and everything.
It’s interesting to note that Daniel Craig and Sean Connery’s films outperform all the others. That’s the way it is. It would give credit to one of Connery’s first 3 films as the best.
I am surprised and pleasantly surprised that “Her Majesty’s Secret Service” has an 82% rating and has reached seventh place. Many of them have publicly stated that Lazenby’s “attitude” was what killed his career, but I also don’t forget one or two critics who accuse the “anti-establishment movement” (of the late 1960s) of having much to do. lack of shine. price of ticket sales for the film after its release. As for me, I’ve enjoyed this particular Bond movie, and I’m more than comfortable with Lazenby’s lack of “actor references” in this one; and the story of HOW he flew out of the office, dried up and broke into Cubby’s office, dressed up as a character and then was absolutely and absolutely fair to the manufacturer, as his lack of delight in acting was the decisive thing for him. the part, it just blows my mind. Each of us has their own favorite Bond movie, but for me, the soundtrack, the chase scenes, the excellent sets, the “sexual innuendos” Array … and especially the heartbreaking final scene of Theresa Array’s death… all of this adds up (for me) to be the most productive in the series, as far as I’m concerned.
According to his assessment: in the 60s, everything fell into disgrace, the heroic characters. Strange esoteric films, French films, etc. were on the show, this helped to be high.
I love those movies, but they’re all actually pretty much the same, so for me, the only one that deserves extra credits is the original, Dr. No.
Sacriledge, I know, but Goldfinger is so overrated. It’s a film that spends more than part of his time shooting in glamorous Kentucky, where Bond is dragged from one position to another and does little more than convert the real hero of the story, Pussy Galore, with the strength of his penis. There are annoying stretches like removing a car comprising a character who is already dead and this golf game (zzz).
Does Skyfall get a 105% adjusted score? I’m giving you stars!
It’s not your high notes …
Ok… here’s my rating … you can also do yours and see the group’s rating consensus https://www.crowdsens.com/DetailTop?TXID=231
Diamonds are Forever is too high on the list.
Sean Connery was perfection. The most productive film is the first, Dr. No. Then from Russia and Goldfinger. Then they slide into mediocrity where explosions and absurdities overwhelm the plot. For me, intelligence, despite everything, came back with Daniel Craig and Casino. Skyfall was mediocre. The previous ratings were obviously paid through the producer.
I am not obliged to agree with the “average” comment. Keep in mind that worrying about a “super spy” mystery is a trick thing in those days. Jason Bourne accomplishes all those things (without the advantages of getting exotic supercars or mannequins by his side) despite the crippling amnesia, Ethan Hunt achieves his goals through the newest devices/technology AND at all times ‘be in the right position at the right time’, so you have all the Marvel/DC superheroes on the back of your brain, when you face something ‘fresh’ to hold and attract a fan base. Also note that “Skyfall” (rather than “all about” Bond) was built ENTIRELY around the basic premise of Judy Dench’s character versus her (inevitable) “accumulation” of past transactions in the intelligence community. Did you even pay attention to Adele’s main theme during the first few tracks? The song was EVERYTHING in “M.” If you prefer Brocolli and Co. make a “Completely” movie about Bond… then you have the past movies to enjoy. Each (in the series) deals with linked “key” topics. Where Skyfall inspired me was the way they controlled to link the eventual fall of ”M”, with an ‘original story’ to locate how/where/why Silva was pushed to the limit (which, in my opinion, was an embarrassing waste of Bardem’s game. -talents, because it was MUCH more ”sinister’ and ”threatening’ in ‘It’s not country for old” which leads to an imaginable replenishment of the command design for the MI6 (Judy Dench actually sought to transfer from the Bond franchise, and it was the smartest way to do it) and, of course, opens the door to introduce a new ‘Q’ while depending on the character, meanwhile, we were surprised by more terrifying clues for what was to come (then) , with the organization “SPECTRE”. All in all, Array … I think Skyfall will probably finish at No. 1 in most Bond fan brains, for some time yet. Having said that, I hope that Michael Fassbfinisher (rather than Idris) will seriously see himself as a repositioning of Craig, or (at least) as an “other” double O agent. Only time will tell.
Michael Fassbender is a wonderful actor. Too wonderful to be Bond, honestly. I don’t need it to be linked to the franchise for the next decade. I can see why Daniel Craig is tired of doing it.
I also need a more youthful bond. Maybe not a 25-year-old, but a 30-year-old would be great. Sean Connery, the only Bond who was young enough when he chose it. It’s time for some other young Bond imo
As long as it’s not Daniel Radcliffe. Just say it.
In the eyes of writers, administrators, producers, etc., Array … you can never be “too cool” to take on the role of James Bond, and now that Lady Judy Dench has been removed from her role as ”M” Array… is probably a conclusion from another region that Daniel Craig will pass by, because less chemistry existed between them … you might not feel the same way; ‘Spectre’ proved it without a shadow of a doubt, given that my friends/family shared their reactions when they saw an ‘M’ symbol on the wall, towards the climax of ‘Spectre’Array… we’ve all agreed that his Absence in His Chain of Command is fundamental to the good fortune (or failure) of any upcoming Bond film with him. It’s definitely time for the Bond franchise to stick to the Bourne game eBook and spin-offs with DOS Double-O… hopefully with Fassbender betting on some other agent, perhaps with Craig’s appearance. You’ll have to think about anything quickly, because ‘Bourne-5′ is being filmed and it’s happening to have Damon and Renner in it… what (unfortunately) makes it difficult to plan and chronology/cross complications of ”the spy universe’ for Cruise, which was actually looking to make another project very unlikely with Renner… who by the way makes Marvel movies … it’s amazing to believe how film managers and their lawyers manage to achieve all of this without being prosecuted. I apologize for hunting like a scratched record on this subject, however, I am very passionate about film and am incredibly agitated by the growing amount of “waste” coming out of Hollywood in those days. There are some occasional bright spots, no doubt … However, it turns out that most things are “previous numbers” or “original stories” with very little emphasis on providing a respectful nod to the same movies/stories that hope to improve.’
Craig understands that the lack of “tension” between Bond and “M” due to his death (Judy Dench) is a death sentence for his continuation as Bond.
You are crazy. I think the next Bond will be Kevin Costner, just because of the accent.
yes, he did a convincing job with Robin-Hood.
It’s sarcasm, isn’t it?
having Connery’s 4 intries (the first 4) in maximum sensations made, however, I don’t see any of the most recent films, adding Skyfall, in this league, it was very volatile in terms of hitale, chronology, etc. Connery and later more serious versions too, appealing to see OMMSService so high, was a very moving story, although Lazenby has a tendency to get low grades, it’s actually Array with a few exceptions.
CASINO ROYALE – Tough Craig Awesome. It’s not gentle or fun like the previous entries, but it’s fast and enjoyable.
SKY FALL-Epic on the way to DIE ANOTHER DAY. One of my favorite Bond videos of all time.
I enjoyed reading his reviews of the Bond movies. My list would be the same as yours, unless it’s two movies. It would update Die Another Day and Dr. No in the most popular segment of Live and Let Die and Tomorrow Never Dies.
This list loses all credibility because Quantum of Solace ranks above all. That terrible movie.
No, cash and I thought.
QOS is not so bad and is even greater than Spectre and Skyfall.
I liked that Skyfall and we see it in Spectre.
This is the worst opinion I’ve had all day, and I’ve spent it all day on the Internet.
So you don’t agree with me? Okay, but don’t call me the “worst” opinion because the reviews are incredibly subjective and therefore it’s too late to call my opinion “the worst” based on the fact that I disagree with you. After all, I could call your opinion stupid or stupid, but I’m rational (which you’re obviously not), which convinces me that you’re an attention-seeking troll or a 12-year-old irrational boy. Personally, I’m convinced anyway. ?
Lol joking
Yes, Quantum of Solace is bad, a primary twist stolen directly in the past 1970s of Clint Eastwood’s “The Eiger Sanction.” The gold cover worked at Goldfinger; an attempt to recreate this in QoS simply shows a lack of imagination. Derived.
Quantum of Solace has been plagued by production disruptions as a result of the Writers Guild strike. Basically, they did history and dialogue on the ground filming. Daniel Craig himself ended up writing parts of this film.
For this reason, the quality of service is almost incomprehensible when viewed for the first time, at least to me. It is slightly assembled and disintegrates constantly as the film progresses. However, I ended up seeing it several times, because it’s an attractive test to see so many disorders in a movie. And I started sympathizing with the film, and now I’m convinced there’s a smart movie behind it. In fact, there are symptoms of the director’s goal (i.e. four action sequences based on the four ancient elements: wind, air, fire, water, which corresponds to the motivations of the villain) and if everything went as originally planned, I have the feeling that this could have been the wisest of all Bond films.
But yes, objectively speaking, at first glance, it’s a dreadful film.
Have you noticed? Some of those other Bond movies are terrible. Dying some other day, more like Dying Before the end of this movie because it’s so bad.
Yes, there are Bond nerd movies, but they have some playback value. I’ve seen QOS twice and never felt susceptible to it.
Like the top reviews of Rotten Tomatoes movies, this list is horrible!
George Laze through a “wooden” Bond that lasted only one film. However, RT places the Lazenthrough film Bond, which is by far the worst bond film, in seventh place.
Best Bond Movie – Goldfinger! The best bond, Sean Connery!
Lazenby’s biggest in his single Bond movie than Dalton in all of his and Moore’s maxim.
No Dalton bigger than Lazenby.
I never bought Dalton for the part. Too gentle and too small to be a difficult guy like Craig and too arrogant to lure women crediblely, as he was not the first. Failure in two critical areas.
I love it when other people lose the spot of Rotten Tomatoes. It’s not like it’s a person’s opinion, or even the opinion of the website’s publishers. They are literally under the complaints of critics.
Of course, we’re all going to love other videos for other reasons, even in a genre, and thank God for that. For the most part, my favorite is Goldfinger, OHMSS is a wonderful movie, and Skyfall and Casino Royale are good, but incredibly exaggerated. So here.
Well said.
Casino Royale is the Bond movie ever made. Skyfall is overrated.
Not the first one, the second.
Well, that’s my opinion.
I don’t know why the year of publication is in their “weighted formula” or why they want a weighted formula at the first position. Oh, yes, then they can place Skyfall and Casino Royale on top, because those videos may not happen alone on the Tomatometer. What absolutely fabricated nonsense.
I think it’s because of the number of reviews that can be obtained from older movies compared to newer ones. Because there are more revisions for newer versions, we get a more accurate representation of the critical consensus.
Or maybe I’m just saying that because I like Casino Royale and Skyfall among all the Bond videos I’ve noticed (certainly, I haven’t noticed them all yet).
Chances are, after watching the rest of Bond, CR and Skyfall videos, they’re still your favorites, because I guess since you haven’t noticed all the Bond videos, you belong to the younger group. With this in mind, the other Bond movies will appear outdated through comparison, which is understandable. This makes it difficult to reach consensus on a list like this. People who grew up with Bond videos will see them from those moments in time, when the movies seemed avant-garde, exciting and fresh, when the younger generation probably won’t.
I agree with you on all accounts.
Daniel Craig is not James Bond. It never will be. And those movies are simply big and only successful thanks to tens of millions of other people committed to global marketing. “Quantum of Solace” is one of the most boring videos ever made and Skyfall’s only smart thing to do is the song made through Adele. I’ve definitely watched all the Bond videos over a hundred times, with the exception of Craig’s horrible videos.
Have you noticed each and every one of the Bond movies more than a hundred times?
Don’t worry. I’m like things will get better soon.
Skyfall sucks! Daniel Craig is the worst of all time!
No one ever said it.
Skyfall at number one? Leave me alone. Daniel Craig’s worst Bond movie. Decent, but incredibly Casino Royale and Quantum Of Solace.
I think the challenge is possibly that they continue to try to make those films exist while linking them to Fleming’s original novels. Bond and the surroundings that made the first films so perfect come from the Cold War. This new format of live fight scenes bigger than life is not what made Ian Fleming’s novels so perfect. And while Daniel Craig is a very intelligent actor, it’s hard to compare him to the ultimate Bond, James Bond that was Sean Connery. This sullen, brutal character is not the Bond I know and appreciate. It’s not that the formula doesn’t work, it’s that the individual elements are quite correct. Let’s put JJ Abrams (Star Trek, Mission Impossible), Christopher McQuarie (Mission Impossible) and possibly Matthew Vaughn (Kingsman’s Secret Service, Kick-ass) in a room to solve this.
About two years ago, I hung up the word on the Internet that Idris Elba was meant to be “considered” as a replacement for Craig. I’ve become INCIENSO. I’m NOT a rascal; Let’s remove that now; and it is not because he feels that he is “unable” to play the role; Backwards. Idris has definitely paid off his debt and has the skills to do whatever he needs. My challenge was with that ridiculous ‘rolling carpet’ in which Bond enthusiasts were forced to ‘accept’ a ‘new Bond’ every two years. My concept was to make Idris play a DIFFERENT “double or”. It was a concept that quietly spread to the bottom of my mind, since I saw this notorious (albeit “short”) scene where ALL nine “Double-Os” were sitting at a rally in a giant hall, towards the beginning of FRWLArray. . and some other times when the exploits of ANOTHER double-o have been discussed (especially in ”The Spy Who Loved Me’, ”Octopussy”) and evidently in ”Goldeneye” (with the animosity screen between Brosnan and Sean Bean) and even the comment “sournois” made by Lazenthrough: “This never happened to the other guy!” The explanation for why I raise all this is because it happened to me that perhaps the most productive way to move the Bond franchise forward is to build on it by creating Bond spin-offs in the same way as Bourne’s films. to a story with Aaron Cross. I think we (the enthusiasts) are “hungry” to find out what’s going on, while Bond goes on vacation/sabbatical. Who was Alec Treveleyan? What else have you completed BEFORE fitting into a “rogue”? That’s what I’m talking about. No “origin” stories … we’ve had enough with the TV series ‘Gotham’ and the X-men, and I’ve had enough. I just need more stories about what the other double-o does, and whether it’s Idris Elba, or Michael Fassbender, or anyone else who did the Bond test and didn’t “pass the cut” Array … at least give them a story, make a double or and turn it into a movie. KNOW that I would sell tickets; especially if he ends up putting them together, like the next (inevitable) Jason Bourne/Aaron Cross feature film.
Well, if you look at Daniel Craig’s imdb, he lists it as a star in “Bond 25” with an unknown long-term date, so it will be him for at least one other movie. I like the derived concept and would love to see the rest of the double 0 in action. Maybe it’s a way to delay time if necessary … or at least send the franchise to a new address. Look… five or six British actors who would go through 00. (No, not ALL) Array… Here it is: OK, Idris Elba, Henry Cavill, Jude Law, Ewan McGregor, Gerard Butler, perhaps Benedict Cumberbatch, then you can head south (if that’s not too insulting) and catch one of the Hemsworths and maybe Simon Baker. (Craig has, what, forty-five years?, then those guys are all younger, some MUCH younger.) Then you take the one or those who make the most productive on a paper of 00 and run with him or with them. And in case the writers read this, no matter what you do, DO NOT put any other naked double 0 in a chair and play pétanque with its lower regions. Unfortunately, Array unfortunately, that’s all I see when I think of Daniel Craig on paper. Thank you.
Mads Mikkelson MUST be selected as the lead agent of “Spectre” or as director of “Spectre” himself. I think Barbara Brocolli missed a golden opportunity there. Carey Elwess would have made a fair double in the early years; very ‘physical’ … however, he did not expand his on-screen character as “dangerous/mature” before “Twister” and “Saw”. I have no idea what he’s been doing lately… maybe even a more ‘physical’ Q (the one who runs, jumps, throws guns instead of hiding a laptop?) It would be a smart concept, now that we have a younger child. , more “physical” money-penny to enjoy? (WITHOUT disrespecting the expensive Lois Maxwell… I’m sure I’m not the ONLY one who misses his presence on the screen. And now that I think about it, I can also appreciate Jim Caviesel’s concept as a double-o… I think of his presence in “The Count of Monte Cristo” (instead of Christ, “The Passion”) but before anyone hits me, NO, I would NOT like to see Guy Pierce as a double or. I would be surprised if he were not approached by the concept, and if that were the case, my respect for him would increase significantly if he (courteously) rejected the offer. Pierce is a damn intelligent actor, but Array.. A little ‘overexposed’, in a way I can’t say. No… putting Guy Pierce in a Bond movie (either as a double-o or as a “Spectre-esche” villain would be like … put raw honey in a cup of coffee. It just wouldn’t work. :: Involuntary cooling ::
Thank you, I’m surprised at your answer. It’s a shame that we’re not writers who can pass on our concepts to Bond people either. In fact, it would be hard work, but it values having some influence in the long run of a much-loved film franchise. I could die satisfied if the 3 Bond videos had a little “I” in them, one way or another. The casting director has a lovely ring … Laughing with laughter
“I’m NOT a rascal; let’s do that now;’
Say what you want, they’re going to call you one.
I don’t know how you can say all the Fleming novels and say you hate the brutal, dark Bond. That’s precisely the literary James Bond. As Fleming himself said, “Bond is a bit of a bastard.
I don’t know how you can say that Fleming’s novels are the right ones and then say you hate the brutal, dark Bond. That’s precisely what the literary James Bond is. As Fleming himself said, “Bond is a little crazy.
(Yes, I know I misspelled the word “B,” the stupid censor of RT’s comments surprises him in a different way.)
Yes, that’s fine. Excellent may not be the right word. Entertainment might be more appropriate. However, I only looked at Spectre, and it was long and very slow with some explosions combined to keep me awake. Not very good. It’s not entertaining. The holes in the plot were huge, the possible options terrible and the effects, good, defied logic and physics. A notch or two under Moonraker.
I still think that the videos of maximum linkage after Sean Connery are formulas and an indistinguishable maxim. I read the books when I was a teenager and they were great. Movies have become too concerned about special effects and explosions. Roger Moore bigger as the Saint than bond. Diana Rigg bigger as Mrs. Peel in the Avengers than as a Bond girl.
Moore the worst and even more movies.
No no No No No No. You can’t have a number one Bond movie without Connery. Impossible.
Thunderball and Goldfinger of all time The best bonus movies EVER!! I’ll NEVER watch a James Bond movie with Craig’s plastic face! That’s scary…………
These lists don’t make any sense to me. I think other people need more than one bond movie, so when they say the worst and the best, it’s super stubborn. How can you say Dalton is a more serious Bond, but the videos lack humor, as an inconvenience? But put the real casino on the most sensible one on the list? Skyfall is a smart movie. Whether you think you’re advertised or not, it’s an opinion. Personally, I think Casino Royale is overrated and doesn’t have the things I’m looking for in a smart bonus movie.
What a delayed list. Who asked Bond to avoid being Bond with the arrival of Daniel Craig? Bond has to do with the best technology, smooth, smooth … a haunted thug.
Casino Royale is more wonderful than Skyfall. The argument between Bond and Vesper Lynd was fantastic. Especially the exercise scene. I didn’t think Skyfall was that wonderful and Quantum of Solace was in the 1920s. He was very weak.
I agree 110%, the discussion between Bond and Vesper (on the train, dinner) is priceless. “How was your lamb?” – “Scrambled!” and looked him in the face when he said it. ohh, the sexual tension between them was PALPABLE.
Connery’s 3 movies have a higher score than Craig’s 2 movies in the 5 most sensitive, so why are they in that order?
The score is weighted by the number of reviews.
Skyfall – Adjusted score: 105%.
It seems legitimate.
“Never say never again” and the first “Casino Royale” do count.
This list is a joke, as any real Bond fan would agree. Instead of sorting them through reviews/tomometers, why search to categorize them through user reviews? I think you’ll end up with a much more accurate list. Is Lazenthrough doing number 7? Seriously??
I’m surprised because they understood this one. Casino Royale takes Bond back to where Ian Fleming sought him: a ‘blunt instrument’. His taste for smart things arose from Fleming’s understanding that most people after World War II couldn’t much, but at least wanted to read about other people who could do it.
No wonder Skyfall is number one. For once, Bond is described as a genuine character with flaws that want to be repaired on a traveling plot device. It features a credible villain from a destructive archetype of Dr. Evil who only needs to rule the world with plans to block the sun. It also has an amazing cinematography to boot. For a double-digit franchise, all of this may not make a smart “Bond” movie according to fan expectations, however, it’s definitely the band’s only smart “movie.”
Skyfall, written through other people who knew nothing about James Bond. I’d compare it in the 1920s. Whoever noticed this movie didn’t. Certainly, “GOLDFINGER” is the most sensible on the list.
Disappointed, they ignored the lifestyles of “Skypecall” and “The Speculum of Quantums” tbh
How is GoldenEye among the 5 most sensitive?
However, Casino Royale has a top tomato score?
I love it when other people don’t care about those lists and they come to Rotten Tomatoes as if the editors of the online page are sorting those movies.
So how does the Bond franchise position itself and oppose the Bourne and Mission Impossible videos? The challenge is that when you try to be realistic and realistic, you oppose those two. So it’s going to have to be a little ridiculous, a tongue on the cheek and so British. Let’s talk about Bond’s most productive theme song. My non-public favorites are: 1. No one makes it bigger (The Spy Who Enjoyed Me) 2. Live and let die. 3. You only live twice 4. Goldfinger.
I agree with much of the location of the list. However, I would do the ‘O’ industry! 2 places. In my opinion, Daniel Craig’s Casino Royale is the most productive film.
There’s nothing like this to get genuine opinions out.
Skyfall – 1? hahaha ok. Another dubious list. The guy with the gold gun in the last 5? This film is 10 times bigger than Moonraker and the Brosnan and Dalton films at most. I would put Live and Let Die – Man with the Golden Gun – On Her Majesty’s Secret Service at the top of 10 with the Connery movies max.
You may no longer agree with the fact that the new ones are at the end.
ẃho gives you those ridiculous lists. Lazerby puts his policeman in 25th position;
Dying Another Day is Bond’s worst film. If you think A View to a Kill is ridiculous, how about an invisible car, Bond surfing on ice with a parachute in the face of a tsunami and the “person” transplanted from Korean to English? And don’t even say DAD is bigger than TWINE. This isn’t even true until now. I agree with critics, however, they are mediocre as much productive in understanding the James Bond films.
I agree; The level of the paragliding on ice everything I needed to convince me that this was the last time we saw Brosnan as Bond. Technically speaking, his most productive “Bond” (from that moment) to play Thomas Crown!
Total nonsense and shows why Rotten Tomatoes is so imperfect. Any “Best of” list that puts Live and Let Die and Quantum of Solace above Spectre is a joke. Let’s say the critics who watched movies 20 or 30 years ago are other people with criteria other than today’s critics. Spectre is a much larger film with better actors, cinematography, action, plot and many other film facets than many other Bond films. It’s probably one of the top 10 Bond movies and much bigger than almost all of Roger Moore and Brosnan’s films.
Well, I didn’t expect Spectre to be ranked in such a low position…
Have you noticed yet?
Yes, to be honest, that’s not a smart thing, but I think it’s at least bigger than the quantum of convenience.
QOS a funny duck, something like that. Taken for adventure, itArray.. dirty, sweaty, sullenArray.. it’s not quite a part of my time or my money … However, it is not one of my favorites (to see), a Saturday or a slow Sunday afternoon. My maximum hated component of the movie is the selection of the main theme (during the first titles). I don’t know how (or why) he chose. Unless they intend to attract urban theaters over twenty years old, I don’t see how “urban/postmodern hip-hop” interacts with the Bond universe in any way, form or form. It’s just not a ‘binding issue’. It’s just my opinion.
To be honest, QOS is starting to grow in me. I daresay it makes me bigger than Spectre, on a darker, grainier level. I’d say QOS is in Spectre as For Your Eye’s Only in Moonraker.
If I’m ever arrested, I hope I have a Bond girl.
Skyfall was boring and I will never perceive love. The most productive link film will be ‘Only for your eyes’. Her Majesty’s secret service is also very good. Everyone talks about the ski scenes, but there’s also a car chase.
Yes. I’m a member of the minority, but I like ‘Only for your eyes’. I call it a lot “Tomorrow never dies.”
Some of Sean Connery’s stuff were my favorites, but they show his age right now. But at least they had plots.
When was “James Bond” an agent who helped the DEA? Ugh. A real low point. What about the submarine in Istanbul? A lot of action is not a conspiracy.
the fall of the terrible sky
Wait a minute. How QoS … also known as POS can be higher than License to Kill if the score is lower? Stupidity at its finest.
Is the sky falling? Seriously? Daniel Craig has been through the worst Bond to date. He looks like a simple terrorist and lacks a sense of humor.
Horrible list. I know other people love Skyfall at Casino Royale, but Quantum of Solace in Spectre? Quantum of Solace is like Bourne’s legacy among Craig’s films (unstable camera and fast editing). And how are the diamonds above Live and Let Die? And the spy who enjoyed me above the golden eyes Leave me alone.
Skyfall is the worst explanation for why the head of the generation department would have hooked the bad pc on the central pc and would be surprised if it were a Trojan with a computer virus for the only explanation as to why it fell into a hole.
Besides, how can you recruit the Joker for MI6? I’m pretty sure they’re being mentally tested before they’re informed of the trade. So how did Batman pass his physical and psychic assessment without falling into a well?
The explanation for why the paintings of the old Bond videos are that they are not spy action videos, creepy action thrillers that Casino Royale has introduced and that do not paint with this new genre. So you only have 2 functions left to fill the plot gaps or return to fantasy spy action.
Skyfall starts very seriously and then tries to give us a getaway thursday through Nostalgiaville, but temporarily abandons the sense of terror that Silva infuses in all sex slaves. The only Bond film to represent Bond near the written character is Goldfinger.
Who made this list? Skyfall number 1? Anyway, something’s wrong with Bond-land. Or other people don’t age well. Or, millennials haven’t noticed all the videos or … It’s good to see Her Majesty’s Secret Service up there, because it’s been one of my favorites for a long time. But this list, as someone who has noticed them all in order, gives me age.
The most productive scene in Skyfall is when Silva tried to scare Bond with an open sex flirtation and Bond said I bet you’re making a bad run. I like the fact that they mention for once that a male spy seduces men more than women. In real life, men outnumber women in governments and the military. In truth, some of the agents of the double O would be women in genuine life.
“SPECTRE” and “Never Say Never Ever”? And worse than “Quantum Of Solace”, “Diamonds are forever” and “Only live twice”? Well, I agree that “SPECTRE” is not the “masterpiece” or the “phenomenon” that were “Goldfinger”, “Skyfall”, “From Russia With Love” and “Casino Royale”. But … what is low? I still can’t think that some external occasions (negative advertising) have disproportionately influenced the minds of many (American) critics who rely on RottenTomatees.
Are there other people who dare to rank all 26 Bond films? I did;-). Here’s my TOP 26:
Skyfail? Are you kidding me? Isn’t that one of Sean Connery’s many right movies? I don’t think so….
Skyfall had a very bad choreography, Bond was unnecessarily exposed to gunfire, etc. They needed an army trainer to help them. I just couldn’t, he was a super spy.
Sean Connery is James Bond
Dude, there are some other people directly and rude here. It’s a matter of opinion, guys, to succeed on that.
Quantum Solace, Skyfall and Casino Royal scouse borrow concepts from Bourne videos or simply use the stupid shaky cameras that make each and every action scene ridiculous.
None of Daniel Craig’s movies were good. They’re at the end of that list.
Daniel Craig doesn’t have the “most attractive guy in the world” who makes a bond.
Connery was the best, Brosnan was much more wonderful than the notes recommend here, even though he couldn’t fight it. Moore’s films have tilted toward parody over time. Dalton and Craig are too serious for Bond and lack sophistication in the sense that I can speak 10 languages and identify a wonderful wine through taste. I don’t make the movie Lazenthrough.
I agree… with the list. Skyfall is my favorite.
Bond’s best film … And there are many bad … is “From Russia with Love”
These odds seem biased compared to the most recent films, however, it is transparent that Sean Connery remains the most productive Bond of all time with 4 of the six most productive films.
I just created my Top 24 Bond movies on CrowdSens.com if everybody updates their ranking, we can see the consensus of the group… check it out https://www.crowdsens.com/DetailTop?TXID=231
Sky Fall is an effort to bring up a character study. He did it. Bradem excellent. I was hoping the next Bond film would take a fresh look at Bond to take advantage of the intensity revealed in SkyFall.
Bardem sleepwalking in this role; I had no choice … probably because he had been warned (or made a conscious effort) not to channel NO from his character from “No Councheck out for Old Men” … Which is a disgrace. As for the “character study” … I see your point of view, but only from the point of view of dating between “M” and Bond. She believed in him when no one else (except Moneypenny) sought him. I owed her a lot, check it out to save her. It’s a finish suitable for Judy Dench’s contribution to the Bond franchise.
For me, Quantum of Solace, the last James Bond film, the rest are nonsense they produced to attract a wider audience. I’m not worried about Craig as James Bond, but I’m worried about the bad plot.
this watch is even for rotten tomatoes. Dr. No, from Russia with love and Goldfinger have a score of 96% with Casino Royale at 95%. The adjusted score is a lot of bs
My two cents anyway
although it’s a very clever ‘action movie’, I still think Craig is Jason Bourne in tuxedo. Bond is a matter of charm, bad jokes, girls, cars and a beaten martini. He’s not a poker-faced vigilante.
… What. I’ve noticed lists that I don’t agree with and, of course, it’s all subjective on those lists, but wow. This list is so far behind in its classification that it defies all logic. Diamonds are eternal and the Spectres are so tough that they belong to the back, around Moonraker. Never Say Never Again was strangely amazing, especially since everything was against it. Die Another Day is notoriously bad, but it’s ridiculously cool and doesn’t give in until the third act. Goldfinger probably deserves the most sensible place, but Casino Royale offers you stiff competition.
It all depends on your non-public preferences, in my opinion, Craig’s Casino Royale is 60% boring, starts great and breaks the conventions of James Bonds, but Figure is what saves the film, for me also crawls, you can eliminate it without problems. 35 minutes of the film without damaging it. Skyfall is the most productive Bond film despite its flaws, Bardem has given a new twist to Bond villains and Spectre is in my opinion 10 steps back in the Craig era, has too many WTF moments like having sex with Monica Belluci after returning home from her husband’s funeral and having sex ‘after the fight’ in the Array exercise , jumped the shark in undeniable terms.
Goldeneye is my favorite, basically because he’s the first one I saw when I was a kid in the ’90s. And Goldeneye 64 is even better, man, I enjoyed this game.
On a more serious note, there’s a big difference between the old Bond movies and the new Bond movies. The staging is another because the target is another. Bond’s original films agreed to be in bad taste and provoke witty phrases. The action is also very large compared to the fashion works. This does not make one larger than the other objectively. I mean, they’re other movies for other purposes.
People who like a more serious movie that’s a little more believable than a guy with a steel-rimmed hat and a big guy with steel jaws, well, they might not be positioning the movies passed over Daniel Craig’s films, which are darker, sullener and more realistic in terms of generation and what the generation can do.
That’s why I love Goldeneye, because it’s a combination of nonsense and seriousness. It doesn’t take itself too seriously, though it provides more serious tones.
Why don’t you get kicked out and you don’t do anything about it?
I hate the attitude of other people who think that if you like old Bond movies, you can’t love new ones. It’s silly! In my opinion, Daniel Craig is the most productive Bond since Sean Connery. I don’t agree with the order of the list, but I’m a big Bond fan. Goldfinger is my favorite.